Key result
Mitral valve prolapse exhibits heterogeneous syndromic and non-syndromic forms linked to DCHS1 and FLNA mutations.
Why the study?
Mitral valve prolapse involves a heterogeneous group of patients with diverse phenotypic expressions, prompting an update on its genetic background.
This review highlights the complex genetic architecture of mitral valve prolapse, emphasizing the potential future role of genetic testing in identifying genotype-phenotype correlations and guiding patient-tailored management.
MVP genetic heterogeneity may refine future risk stratification; leaves open whether testing should guide management.
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) has a prevalence of 2–3% among the population. It involves a heterogeneous group of patients with different expressions and according to the phenotype can be further divided into fibroelastic deficiency, which is mainly considered as a degeneration due to aging, and myxomatous disease, frequently associated with familiar clusters. Thus, MVP can be present in syndromic, when part of a well-defined syndrome, and non-syndromic forms. The latter occurs more often. To the second belong both familiar and isolated or sporadic forms. On one hand, among familial forms, although X-linked transmission related to FLNA gene was initially identified, further studies reported also autosomal dominant mode involving MVPP genes, including DCHS1. On the other hand, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), among unrelated patients, allowed the identification of new MVP-associated genes, such as LMCD1, GLIS, and TNS1. Moreover, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on metalloproteinase genes have been related to MVP. Interestingly some genes such as DCHS1 and DZIP1 have been reported to be involved in both familiar and isolated forms. The present review aims to illustrate the updated genetic background of MVP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guicciardi et al. (2022) conducted a review in Mitral valve prolapse. Mitral valve prolapse is a heterogeneous condition with both syndromic and non-syndromic forms associated with various genetic mutations, including DCHS1 and FLNA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: