What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a behavioral intervention targeting cognitive fatigability in people with multiple sclerosis.

May 25, 2026Open Access

A pilot, single-arm feasibility study of a multidimensional behavioral intervention for cognitive fatigability in multiple sclerosis: Mental Energy Boost program

Key Points

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a behavioral intervention targeting cognitive fatigability in people with multiple sclerosis.
Conducted an 8-week group-based intervention via video conference for cognitive fatigability.
Assessed feasibility indicators including eligibility, recruitment, adherence, and completion using a traffic-light framework.
Gathered participant feedback through focus groups after the intervention.
54% of screened participants were eligible, with 18 enrolled, reflecting high recruitment uptake.
Participants reported high satisfaction (92% rated >5 on a 10-point scale) and helpfulness of sessions (92% scoring ≥ 24/40).
Per-session attendance averaged 81.62%, with completion rates at 89%, and treatment fidelity noted in 79% of sessions.

Abstract

Background Cognitive fatigability (CF), the decline in performance following sustained cognitive effort, remains less understood in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) than subjective fatigue, and no behavioral interventions have yet specifically targeted CF in PwMS. Purpose This study assessed the feasibility of an 8-week, group-based, video conference-delivered behavioral intervention for CF in PwMS to determine if proceeding to a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) is advised. Methods The program was adapted from a validated teleconference-based program for fatigue in MS, incorporating additional components targeting factors known to contribute to CF, and informed by investigators' clinical expertise and perspectives of PwMS from a needs assessment survey. Following the sessions, focus group discussions took place to gather participant's feedback. Feasibility was assessed by tracking eligibility, recruitment, adherence, completion, acceptability, and treatment fidelity, using a traffic-light framework (GREEN = proceed to RCT; AMBER = amend before proceeding to RCT; RED = do not proceed to RCT) to determine whether modifications are needed before a full trial, with thresholds based on prior feasibility studies. Results Of 39 PwMS screened from an MS clinic sample, 21 (54%) were eligible and 18 were enrolled (86%), reflecting a high recruitment uptake. Recruitment was completed over 9 months. Satisfaction with the overall program was high, with 92% respondents rating their satisfaction 5 on a 10-point scale (1 = completely dissatisfied; 10 = completely satisfied). Perceived helpfulness of sessions was also high (92% scoring ≥ 24/40). Per session attendance ranged from 59% to 94% (Mean = 81.62%), with an 89% ( n = 16) completion rate, and a 94% ( n = 15) focus group attendance rate. Treatment fidelity (i.e., coverage of manualized content) was high, with the facilitator adhering to the session length in 79% of sessions. Conclusion Most feasibility indicators met “GREEN” criteria, supporting progression to a full trial. Recruitment period duration was the only indicator that fell within the AMBER zone, indicating a need for procedural adjustments before a full trial. No indicator fell in the RED zone.

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Islam et al. (Thu,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e67d0e02ee3982d316c2 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1823950

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Bookmark

View Full Paper