Why the study?
Participation in sport carries a risk of rare but high-impact critical incidents, creating a need for a practical, standardised framework for preparation, management, and follow-up.
This position statement outlines a standardized framework for emergency action plans and post-incident care to improve athlete safety and welfare during and after critical incidents.
Supports adoption of standardized emergency protocols in sports; extends expert consensus on athlete safety.
Participation in sport provides substantial physical and mental health benefits; however, it also carries a risk of rare but high-impact critical incidents. This policy brief outlines a practical, standardised framework for the preparation, management, and follow-up of such incidents in sport. Drawing on current evidence and expert consensus, we emphasise the importance of robust, rehearsed emergency action plans tailored to specific environments, alongside structured post-incident care incorporating communication, debriefing, and psychological support through the “5Cs” approach. This position statement has been endorsed by the UK Faculty of Sport and Exercise Medicine, supporting its relevance and alignment with current best practice. By integrating prevention, acute response, and rehabilitation, this work provides actionable guidance to improve athlete safety and promote consistent, high-quality care across diverse sporting contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heron et al. (2026) studied Critical incidents in sport. Emergency action plans and post-traumatic care protocols was evaluated. A standardized framework incorporating rehearsed emergency action plans and structured post-incident care using the '5Cs' approach is recommended to manage critical incidents in sport.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: