Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Commentary introduces a social marketing framework to enhance implementation science, suggesting innovative strategies for practice adoption.
Implementation science struggles to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap because market dynamics at the T3 (translation to practice) and T4 (translation to populations) stages remain unaddressed. This commentary advances three theoretical claims: implementation stages constitute distinct markets where adoption failures are market failures; exchange theory must extend to multi-level ecosystems; and system dynamics-based interactive learning environments (SD-ILEs) enable mental model restructuring via co-created narrative experiences. I propose a social marketing framework across the T3-T4 continuum, differentiating it from leading implementation frameworks. The approach is illustrated through Pb-ROADS, a narrative-computational ILE for lead (Pb) exposure prevention. Implications include new outcome metrics (e.g., market share of evidence-based practices), practitioner competencies like "systems fluency," and a reassessment of academic training infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brian J. Biroscak (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: