Examines oxygen reduction kinetics in a binuclear Cu(II) complex, suggesting design impacts efficiency.
The oxygen reduction efficacy of a binuclear Cu(II) complex [Cu2(PaPy3H)2](ClO4)4 (1) (H-PaPy3 = N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine-N-ethyl-2-pyridine-2-carboxamide) is reported. In this complex, the ligand featuring a carboxamido moiety coordinates two Cu(II) centers in a [3 + 2] ligand-sharing motif. Notably, the carboxamido moiety binds to Cu(II) via the oxygen donor atom, in contrast to the more typical nitrogen coordination observed with a structurally related N5-carboxamido ligand, H-dpaq (H-dpaq = 2-[bis(pyridine-2-ylmethyl)]amino-N-quinolin-8-yl-acetamidate). Chronoamperometry (CA) and computational analyses clearly indicated two consecutive one-electron-reduction events, Cu(II)/Cu(II) to Cu(II)/Cu(I) or Cu(I)/Cu(II), followed by the appearance of the Cu(I)/Cu(I) state. Despite a large Cu(II)···Cu(II) separation, a degenerate set of d-orbitals enables efficient electron sharing between the two Cu centers, facilitating reduction while preserving structural integrity. Complex 1 efficiently catalyzes 4e–/4H+ reduction of O2 to H2O using decamethylferrocene (Fc*) as the electron donor and perchloric acid (HClO4) as the proton source in dimethylformamide (DMF) at 298 K. Compared to the mononuclear Cu(II) complex, [CuII(dpaq)](ClO4) (2), complex 1 exhibits significantly faster ORR kinetics. Mechanistic studies, supported by spectrokinetic analysis, reveal a key difference in the rate-determining step (RDS) of the dioxygen reduction by these complexes. For complex 2, the RDS involves a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) to the Cu(II)-superoxo intermediate, while for complex 1, the formation of the putative Cu(II)-superoxo species itself constitutes the RDS. This study highlights the crucial role of binuclearity, wherein one Cu binds O2 while the second Cu supplies the electron required for Cu(II)-hydroperoxo formation, unveiling how the ligand design and nuclearity govern the ORR mechanism and efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: