Review examines challenges and solutions for bifacial solar panels in marine settings, indicating future pathways for effective use.
The deployment of floating photovoltaics (FPV) is growing to overcome land-use constraints, but the extension of bifacial photovoltaics (bPV) in marine environments has yet to be thoroughly systematized as outstanding optical and mechanical durability challenges remain. Analogous studies regard over-water reflectance as scalar albedo, seldom include motion-induced mismatch in yield prediction and typically fail to incorporate marine-specific cost and reliability drivers that collectively limit bankable appraisal. Proposed a systematic stressor–impact–mitigation hierarchy that connects marine environmental drivers throughout the lagoon, nearshore, and offshore across BRDF-dependent reflectance (R), metocean dynamics (H/U), salt aerosols (C/D) and biofouling (BN) to optical, thermal, electrical and structural responses. We introduce a motion-aware performance modeling concept involving the joint effects of metocean parameters (Hs, Tp, U10) with frame orientation factors that control angle-of-incidence effects and spatial sorting propagation mechanisms to enhance yield prediction fidelity. Marine-specific CAPEX/OPEX components are integrated into an LCOE sensitivity analysis of techno-economic synthesis, highlighting that energy-optimal layouts may not align with cost-optimal configurations. The analysis highlights key gaps in evidence, including long-duration co-logged rear-POA and motion datasets; multi-stressor durability qualification protocols; standardized marine design paradigms. Introducing a forward roadmap to facilitate marine bifacial FPV systems model validation, durability certification, and bankable deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: