Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows enhanced microgrid management in diverse scenarios, suggesting improved efficiency.
The integrated management of modern microgrids presents significant challenges arising from the heterogeneous nature of distributed energy resources, the need for real-time adaptive control, and the growing requirement for regulatory compliance, challenges that existing energy management frameworks address only in isolation. This paper presents a novel digital architecture that synergizes cloud computing, a full alternating current optimal power flow formulation, and real-time edge control within a vertical, iterative, and distributed paradigm. The alternating current optimal power flow explicitly incorporates electric vehicle charging via the constant impedance-constant current-constant power load model and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning thermal dynamics, alongside integration of electric vehicles and controllable demand. This allows for the realization of high-level objectives, low-level real-time control and protection strategies, and the dynamic adaptation of control signals to real-time network dynamics. A dynamic re-triggering mechanism ensures the optimization adapts to real-time network events within one 5-minute cycle, while edge-level protection and control functions respond in real-time independently of cloud communication status. Validation through a Hardware-in-the-Loop setup at the Power Networks Demonstration Centre across seven operational scenarios demonstrates 288 consecutive alternating current optimal power flow runs with zero failed solves, a maximum voltage deviation of 2.3% from nominal, and 100% market dispatch accuracy. The proposed architecture provides a cost-effective alternative to conventional solutions, with edge hardware below $1000 per unit compared to industry-standard costs of $155,000–$470,000 per MW, underscoring the practical applicability and real-world readiness of the proposed framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patsidis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: