The paper compares Kautilya's governance principles with modern welfare state frameworks, suggesting effective approaches.
Good Governance is a term that has become an agenda of almost all development institutions. It has different connotations to different organizations. Kautilya’s Arthasastra is an epochal treatise dealing with art of government, its well-functioning, the duties and responsibilities of the king and his ministers and above all the concerns of his subjects. It focuses on a welfare-centric state (yogakshema) where the ruler’s happiness lies in the subject’s welfare. It emphasizes a strong centralized monarchy with an accountable, efficient, and ethical administration focused on justice, economic prosperity, and national security. Kautilya focused on ruler’s duty and welfare, the state must protect people, maintain law, and order and provide infrastructure to encourage economic growth. He focused on accountable bureaucracy with officials of high integrity, merit and morality, focus on justice based on fairness and righteousness which he called ‘danda’. A king who acts in his people’s best interest, remains diligent and acts as a servant of the state ensures long-term stability and success. Good governance and the welfare state are essential to modern society creating a framework where government acts as a transparent, accountable, and efficient steward of public resources to ensure economic and social well-being. Accountability, transparency, rule of law, participation and consensus, effectiveness and efficiency are the buzzwords of good governance. Welfare state in modern society focused on social safety needs, providing fundamental services like healthcare, quality education, housing facility, and economic equity are the key concepts of welfare state. Good governance acts as the mechanism for delivering welfare services efficiently, ensuring that the state’s efforts are both effective and equitable. This paper attempts to provide an explanatory concept of Kautilya’s concept of good governance and welfare state with a comparative view of modern governance and welfare state based on secondary sources like books, journals, and websites to draw an comprehensive analysis of the same.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dr. Krishna Roy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: