PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026International Journal of Constitutional Law0 citations

La sutil vitalidad del derecho internacional. El caso de la legalización del aborto en Argentina

View Full Paper
AMAgustina Ramón MichelCenter for the Study of State and SocietyDZDonatella ZalloccoRed de Investigación en Sida

Key Points

  • This article analyzes the impact of international human rights law on abortion legalization in Argentina.
  • Identified three normative cycles in the legal contestation of abortion.
  • Analyzed the role of various actors and their framing in the cycles.
  • Explored the contribution of health professionals to the use of international human rights law.
  • Three normative cycles showcased distinct points of conflict and actor roles in abortion legalization.
  • Health professionals significantly advanced the normative force of international human rights law despite lacking formal legal authority.
  • International human rights law was used flexibly and contingently by diverse actors reflecting multiple perspectives.

Abstract

Abstract This article provides an analysis of the role of international human rights law (IHRL) in the legalization of abortion in Argentina. The notion of abortion as a criminal act was contested recently through what we identify as three normative cycles, ultimately resulting in a new legal standard. Each of the normative cycles is characterized by a point of contestation, certain actors, framing, and norm-setting. In each cycle, IHRL played a distinctive, though often understated, role. IHRL indeterminacy and expressive capacity enabled actors with divergent, even opposing, positions to mobilize it, reflecting the extended, contested, flexible, and contingent uses reported in the literature. However, we also found a less expected dimension: the normative force of IHRL was most powerfully advanced by health professionals, who, despite lacking formal legal powers or any relevant engagement with global legal discourse, incorporated it into their professional repertoire, thereby contributing to the transformation of abortion care. Este artículo ofrece un análisis sobre los usos del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos (DIDH) en el proceso de legalización del aborto en Argentina. La concepción de que el aborto es un crimen fue desafiada legalmente a través de lo que identificamos como tres ciclos normativos. Cada ciclo tuvo su foco de conflicto, sus actores propios, su encuadre normativo y su momento de institucionalización, en el que el DIDH cumplió un papel distintivo, aunque no necesariamente estridente. La indeterminación y la capacidad expresiva del DIDH incitaron a actores con posiciones diversas, incluso opuestas, a emplearlo. Se verifican así los usos extendidos, disputados, flexibles y contingentes reportados por la literatura. Pero también hallamos otros usos insospechados: el DIDH adquirió su mayor fuerza normativa de la mano de profesionales de la salud, quienes, sin competencia formal legal ni familiaridad con lo global, lo integraron a su repertorio, contribuyendo a transformar la atención sanitaria del aborto.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e7e80e02ee3982d329a9https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moag048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper