Key result
Psychological distress is not independently linked to serum CRP levels.
Why the study?
To examine the association of psychological distress with serum C-reactive protein in a South African cohort.
Is psychological distress independently associated with elevated serum C-reactive protein levels in South African adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=3,944)
Yes
Is psychological distress independently associated with elevated serum C-reactive protein levels in South African adults?
The association between psychological distress and elevated CRP is confounded by demographic and clinical factors, indicating CRP is not a useful independent biomarker of psychological distress.
No independent CRP-distress link after adjustment cautions against biomarker use; leaves open demographic confounding in observational data.
To examine the association of psychological distress with serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in a South African cohort. Data were analysed on individuals aged older than 15 years from the South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES) of 2012. Psychological distress was evaluated using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Linear regression models assessed the association of psychological distress with serum CRP, adjusting for possible confounding factors. The analytic sample comprised n = 3944 individuals (mean age = 40 and sex = 36% males). Psychological distress was significantly associated with increased serum CRP levels (B = 0.31 and p = 0.001). This association was no longer significant after adjusting for demographic variables, lifestyle factors, cardiac disease, diabetes, hypertension, trauma and anti-inflammatory medication use (B = 0.15 and p = 0.062). Conclusion: Psychological distress was associated with elevated levels of CRP among South African adults. However, the association was confounded by a range of factors, with demographic variables (age, sex and population group) having the largest confounding effect. These findings indicate that CRP is not a useful biomarker of psychological distress, and that additional work is needed on the underlying psychobiology of psychological distress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Human Sciences Research Council (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Psychological distress (n=3,944). Psychological distress was evaluated on Association of psychological distress with serum CRP (adjusted) (B = 0.15, p=0.062). Psychological distress was not significantly associated with serum CRP levels after adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors (B = 0.15, p = 0.062).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: