Key result
Psychological distress was not significantly associated with elevated serum CRP levels after adjusting for demographic and lifestyle confounders (B = 0.15, p = 0.062).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the association between psychological distress and serum C-reactive protein in a South African cohort.
Is psychological distress associated with elevated serum C-reactive protein in South African adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=3,944)
Is psychological distress associated with elevated serum C-reactive protein in South African adults?
The association between psychological distress and elevated CRP is primarily driven by confounding demographic factors, suggesting CRP is not a useful biomarker for psychological distress.
Psychological distress-CRP link warrants no practice change; leaves open causality and clinical relevance in this population.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of psychological distress with serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in a South African cohort. METHODS: Data were analysed on individuals aged ≥15 years from the South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES) of 2012. Psychological distress was evaluated using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Linear regression models assessed the association of psychological distress with serum CRP, adjusting for possible confounding factors. RESULTS: The analytic sample comprised n = 3944 individuals (mean age = 40 and sex = 36% males). Psychological distress was significantly associated with increased serum CRP levels (B = 0.31 and p = 0.001). This association was no longer significant after adjusting for demographic variables, lifestyle factors, cardiac disease, diabetes, hypertension, trauma and anti-inflammatory medication use (B = 0.15 and p = 0.062). CONCLUSION: Psychological distress was associated with elevated levels of CRP among South African adults. However, the association was confounded by a range of factors, with demographic variables (age, sex and population group) having the largest confounding effect. These findings indicate that CRP is not a useful biomarker of psychological distress, and that additional work is needed on the underlying psychobiology of psychological distress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sewpaul et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Psychological distress (n=3,944). Psychological distress was evaluated on Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (B = 0.15, p=0.062). Psychological distress was not significantly associated with elevated serum CRP levels after adjusting for demographic and lifestyle confounders (B = 0.15, p = 0.062).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: