Assesses clinician knowledge and attitudes on Lyme disease, suggesting educational needs in emerging areas.
Introduction: Lyme disease has expanded into western North Carolina. We sought to document knowledge, attitudes, and practices among clinicians in this region. Materials and Methods: A survey was administered to clinicians in western North Carolina. Frequencies summarized Lyme-related care. Fisher’s exact test compared low-knowledge items (<75% correct) by provider type, clinical experience, and regional tenure. Likert-type items measured attitudes; open-ended responses identified education barriers. Results: Among 28 participants, 59% (16/27) saw a suspected Lyme case in the past year. The median knowledge score was 59% (interquartile range: 47–73%), with low confidence interpreting test results (median Likert score = 2, interquartile range: 1–3). Correct identification of erythema migrans timing differed by regional tenure (≤5 years: 16/18 [89%]; >5 years: 3/8 [38%]; p = 0.014). Recognition of when testing is not recommended differed by provider type (physician: 11/20 [55%], nurse practitioner: 0/6 [0%]; p = 0.024). Perceived education barriers included cost, time, and small patient population. Discussion: Overall, knowledge was limited, particularly for diagnostic testing. Clinicians in emerging communities should be prioritized for educational interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pretsch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: