Provides a historical overview of indirect myocardial revascularization and the role of selective cine coronary arteriography in evaluating its clinical results.
Historical context on indirect revascularization warrants no practice change; leaves open archival insights into arteriography's diagnostic evolution.
Indirect Myocardial RevascularizationON the basis of the myocardial sinusoidal circulation demonstrated by the detailed pathological studies of Wearn and his associates,1 Vineberg postulated that a freely bleeding artery surgically implanted into the myocardium might achieve adequate initial runoff and later establish inter-coronary arterial collateral.2 Vineberg applied the indirect revascularization procedure clinically, with apparently excellent early clinical results.3 Skepticism concerning the procedure prevailed for many years because of the lack of objective evaluation of the clinical results. It was not until the development of an effective method for selective cine coronary arteriography by Sones,4 that objective . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mundth et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: