Key result
Abdominal and lower-extremity compression reduces orthostatic HR increases versus no compression in healthy young individuals.
Why the study?
Body compression reduces orthostatic heart rate increase, but its effects on the cardiac autonomic systems controlling heart rate remained unclear.
Does abdominal and lower-extremity compression reduce orthostatic heart rate increase and alter heart rate variability during a head-up tilt test in healthy young individuals?
RCT (n=39)
Computer-generated random numbers
No
Does abdominal and lower-extremity compression reduce orthostatic heart rate increase and alter heart rate variability during a head-up tilt test in healthy young individuals?
p-value: p=<0.001
Abdominal and lower-extremity compression attenuates orthostatic tachycardia and sympathetic activation during head-up tilt in healthy individuals, providing a mechanistic basis for its potential use in orthostatic intolerance syndromes.
Provides mechanistic rationale for compression in orthostatic intolerance; warrants targeted RCTs in affected patients.
Introduction Abdominal and lower-extremity compression techniques can help reduce orthostatic heart rate increase. However, the effects of body compression on the cardiac autonomic systems, which control heart rate, remain unclear. This study aimed to compare heart rate variability, a reflection of cardiac autonomic regulation, during a head-up tilt test with and without abdominal and lower-extremity compression in healthy young individuals. Methods In a randomized crossover design, 39 healthy volunteers (20 females, aged 20.9 ± 1.2 years) underwent two head-up tilt tests with and without abdominal and lower-extremity compression. Heart rate and heart rate variability parameters were measured during the head-up tilt tests, including Stress Index, root mean square of successive differences between adjacent R-R intervals, low- and high-frequency components, and low-to-high frequency ratio. Results Abdominal and lower-extremity compression reduced the orthostatic increase in heart rate (p < 0.001). The tilt-induced changes in heart rate variability parameters, except for the low-frequency component, were smaller in the compression condition than in the no-compression condition (p < 0.001). Additionally, multiple regression analysis with potentially confounding variables revealed that the compression-induced decrease in Stress Index during the head-up tilt position was a significant independent variable for the compression-induced reduction in heart rate in the head-up tilt position (coefficient = 0.411, p = 0.025). Comparative analyses revealed that abdominal and lower-extremity compression has a notable impact on the compensatory sympathetic activation and vagal withdrawal typically observed during orthostasis, resulting in a reduction of the increase in heart rate. Furthermore, this decrease in heart rate was primarily attributed to the attenuation of cardiac sympathetic activity associated with compression. Conclusion Our findings could contribute to the appropriate application of compression therapy for preventing orthostatic tachycardia. This study is registered with UMIN000045179.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oyake et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=39). Abdominal and lower-extremity compression vs. No compression was evaluated on Orthostatic increase in heart rate (p=<0.001). Abdominal and lower-extremity compression significantly reduced the orthostatic increase in heart rate compared to no compression during a head-up tilt test in healthy young individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: