Key result
Corrected maternal CHD shows no difference in third-trimester umbilical artery Doppler indices versus low-risk controls.
Why the study?
Differences in maternal hemodynamics at rest and during exercise between pregnant women with corrected congenital heart disease and low-risk controls, and their correlations with fetal Doppler indices and birth weight, remained to be compared.
Cohort
Third-trimester Doppler indices do not differ between low-risk pregnancies and those with corrected congenital heart disease, suggesting lower birth weights in CHD are not primarily due to defective placentation.
Reassuring third-trimester Dopplers in corrected CHD should not alter surveillance; supports non-placental mechanisms for lower birth weights and leaves open further study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in maternal hemodynamics, measured non-invasively by impedance cardiography and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)-at rest and with high-intensity exercise-between pregnant women with corrected congenital heart disease (CHD) and low-risk (LR) pregnant controls, and to correlate these findings with umbilical artery Doppler in the third trimester, estimated fetal weight (EFW) and birth weight (BW). METHODS: Prospective longitudinal study with hemodynamic exercise studies and fetal ultrasound between 30 and 34 weeks' gestation. Approval was obtained from London South East Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS: There were no differences in heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), or cardiac output (CO) at rest between the two groups. HR at peak exercise was significantly lower in the CHD group, and MAP was significantly higher at rest and immediately after exercise. In the CHD group there was a significant association between CO at peak exercise and BW. In the LR group there was a significant association between peak CO with exercise and the abdominal circumference/EFW ratio and between HR at rest and BW. There were no differences in the Doppler indices between groups. There was a statistically significant association between uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index and BW in the LR group, but not in the CHD group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between Doppler indices in the third trimester between a LR population and a population with corrected CHD with no or minimal functional impairment. This suggests that factors other than defective placentation may be causing the lower BW in the CHD population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Pregnancy with corrected congenital heart disease. Corrected congenital heart disease vs. Low-risk pregnant controls was evaluated on Differences in maternal hemodynamics and correlation with umbilical artery Doppler, estimated fetal weight, and birth weight. Pregnant women with corrected congenital heart disease showed no difference in third-trimester umbilical artery Doppler indices compared to low-risk controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: