Key result
Angiographic volume-derived measurements of fractional flow reserve correlated linearly with pressure-wire measurements in a swine model (r = 0.85, p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does angiography-based fractional flow reserve correlate with pressure-wire based fractional flow reserve in a swine model of coronary stenosis?
Does angiography-based fractional flow reserve correlate with pressure-wire based fractional flow reserve in a swine model of coronary stenosis?
Effect estimate: r = 0.85
p-value: p=<0.001
Angiography-based FFR correlates strongly with pressure-wire FFR in a swine model, suggesting a potential method to assess physiological stenosis severity without needing to cross the lesion with a pressure wire.
Coronary angiography provides excellent visualization of coronary arteries, but has limitations in assessing the clinical significance of a coronary stenosis. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been shown to be reliable in discerning stenoses responsible for inducible ischemia. The purpose of this study is to validate a technique for FFR quantification using angiographic image data. The study was carried out on 10 anesthetized, closed-chest swine using angioplasty balloon catheters to produce partial occlusion. Angiography based FFR was calculated from an angiographically measured ratio of coronary blood flow to arterial lumen volume. Pressure-based FFR was measured from a ratio of distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure. Pressure-wire measurements of FFR (FFR( P )) correlated linearly with angiographic volume-derived measurements of FFR (FFR( V )) according to the equation: FFR( P ) = 0.41 FFR( V ) + 0.52 (P-value < 0.001). The correlation coefficient and standard error of estimate were 0.85 and 0.07, respectively. This is the first study to provide an angiographic method to quantify FFR in swine. Angiographic FFR can potentially provide an assessment of the physiological severity of a coronary stenosis during routine diagnostic cardiac catheterization without a need to cross a stenosis with a pressure-wire.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2011) studied Coronary stenosis (experimental swine model) (n=10). Angiographic volume-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRV) vs. Pressure-wire fractional flow reserve (FFRP) was evaluated on Correlation between FFRV and FFRP (r = 0.85, p=<0.001). Angiographic volume-derived measurements of fractional flow reserve correlated linearly with pressure-wire measurements in a swine model (r = 0.85, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: