Key result
Zero-fluoroscopy ablation is linked to ~17-minute shorter procedure times vs near-zero fluoroscopy.
Why the study?
Complete elimination of fluoroscopy during RFA of IVAs originating from the aortic sinus cusp is challenging.
Does zero-fluoroscopy radiofrequency ablation maintain similar feasibility, safety, and effectiveness compared to near-zero fluoroscopy in patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the aortic sinus cusp?
Observational (n=104)
Yes
Does zero-fluoroscopy radiofrequency ablation maintain similar feasibility, safety, and effectiveness compared to near-zero fluoroscopy in patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the aortic sinus cusp?
Zero-fluoroscopy ablation for idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias from the aortic sinus cusp is feasible, safe, and effective, becoming the preferred technique with growing operator experience.
May shorten aortic cusp VA ablation times without added risk; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
Complete elimination of fluoroscopy during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (IVAs) originating from the aortic sinus cusp (ASC) is challenging. The aim was to assess the feasibility, safety and a learning curve for a zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) approach in centers using near-zero fluoroscopy (NOX) approach in IVA-ASC. Between 2012 and 2018, we retrospectively enrolled 104 IVA-ASC patients referred for ZF RFA or NOX using a 3-dimensional electroanatomic (3D-EAM) system (Ensite, Velocity, Abbott, USA). Acute, short and long-term outcomes and learning curve for the ZF were evaluated. ZF was completed in 62 of 75 cases (83%) and NOX in 32 of 32 cases (100%). In 13 cases ZF was changed to NOX. No significant differences were found in success rates between ZF and NOX, no major complications were noted. The median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 65.0 [45-81] and 0.0 [0-5] min respectively, being shorter for ZF than for NOX. With growing experience, the preference for ZF significantly increased-43% (23/54) in 2012-2016 vs 98% (52/53) in 2017-2018, with a simultaneous reduction in the procedure time. ZF ablation can be completed in almost all patients with IVA-ASC by operators with previous experience in the NOX approach, and after appropriate training, it was a preferred ablation technique. The ZF approach for IVA-ASC guided by 3D-EAM has a similar feasibility, safety, and effectiveness to the NOX approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Styczkiewicz et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia originating from the aortic sinus cusp (n=104). Zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) approach using 3D-electroanatomical mapping vs. Near-zero fluoroscopy (NOX) approach was evaluated on Median procedure time (minutes) (p=0.002). The zero-fluoroscopy approach for catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias from the aortic sinus cusp significantly reduced median procedure time (58.0 vs 75.0 minutes) compared to near-zero fluoroscopy, with similar safety and effectiveness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: