Key result
KardiaMobile-6L shows good agreement with 12-lead ECG for QTc monitoring in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Why the study?
Smartphone-based heart monitors expand ECG monitoring options, but their reliability in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains unknown.
Does KardiaMobile-6L reliably measure QTc intervals compared to standard 12-lead ECG in critically ill COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does KardiaMobile-6L reliably measure QTc intervals compared to standard 12-lead ECG in critically ill COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation?
KardiaMobile-6L is a feasible and reliable alternative to standard 12-lead ECG for monitoring QTc intervals in critically ill COVID-19 patients, potentially reducing staff exposure and saving time.
May support handheld ECG use for QTc monitoring in ventilated COVID-19 patients; leaves open validation in larger prospective studies.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) represents an essential tool to determine cardiac electrical abnormalities in COVID-19 patients, the effects of anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs, and potential drug interactions. Smartphone-based heart monitors have increased the spectrum of ECG monitoring however, we are not aware of its reliability in critically ill COVID-19 patients. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of nurse-performed smartphone electrocardiography for QT interval monitoring in critically ill COVID-19 patients using KardiaMobile-6L compared with the standard 12-lead ECG. An observational comparative study was conducted comparing consecutive KardiaMobile-6L and 12-lead ECG recordings obtained from 20 patients admitted to the intensive care unit with SARS-CoV-2 infection and on invasive mechanical ventilation. The heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) intervals measured by KardiaMobile-6L and 12-lead ECG were compared. In 60 percent of the recordings, QTc intervals measured by KardiaMobile-6L matched those by 12-lead ECG. The QTc intervals measured by KardiaMobile-6 and 12-lead ECG were 428 ± 45 ms and 425 ± 35 ms (p = 0.82), respectively. The former demonstrated good agreement (bias = 2.9 ms; standard deviation of bias = 29.6 ms) with the latter, using the Bland-Altman method of measurement agreement. In all but one recording, KardiaMobile-6L demonstrated QTc prolongation. QTc interval monitoring with KardiaMobile-6L in critically ill COVID-19 patients was feasible and demonstrated reliability comparable to the standard 12-lead ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaballos et al. (2023) conducted an observational in COVID-19 (n=20). KardiaMobile-6L vs. Standard 12-lead ECG was evaluated on QTc interval (ms) (ICC 0.84, 95% CI 0.6-0.93, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: