Key result
Left ventricular pacing at the site of shortest QRS duration significantly improved +dP/dtmax by 18% compared to baseline (P<0.001), but was inferior to a hemodynamically guided strategy.
Why the study?
Does the site of left ventricular pacing affect QRS duration and acute hemodynamic response in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and LBBB undergoing CRT?
RCT (n=35)
Random order
Does the site of left ventricular pacing affect QRS duration and acute hemodynamic response in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and LBBB undergoing CRT?
Changes in QRS duration during LV pacing correlate with acute hemodynamic response, confirming the link between electrical activation and hemodynamic improvement in CRT.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QRS-shortest site pacing improves acute hemodynamics but remains inferior; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter CRT practice.
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have demonstrated that left ventricular (LV) pacing site is a critical parameter in optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The present study evaluates the effect of pacing from different LV locations on QRS duration (QRSd) and their relationship to acute hemodynamic response in congestive heart failure patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block referred for CRT device implantation were studied. Eleven predetermined LV pacing sites were systematically assessed in random order: epicardial: coronary sinus (CS); endocardial: basal and mid-cavity (septal, anterior, lateral, and inferior), apex, and the endocardial site facing the CS pacing site. For each patient QRSd and +dP/dtmax during baseline (AAI) and DDD LV pacing at 2 atrioventricular delays were compared. Response to CRT was significantly better in patients with wider baseline QRSd (≥150 milliseconds). Hemodynamic response was inversely correlated to increase of QRSd during LV pacing (short atrioventricular [AV] delay: r = 0.44, P < 0.001; long AV delay: r = 0.59, P < 0.001). Compared to baseline, LV pacing at the site of shortest QRSd significantly improved +dP/dtmax (+18 ± 25%, P < 0.001) but was not superior to other conventional strategy (lateral wall, CS pacing, and echo-guided) and was inferior to a hemodynamically guided strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we have demonstrated that changes of QRSd during LV pacing correlated with acute hemodynamic response and that LV pacing location was a primary determinant of paced QRSd. Although QRSd did not predict the maximum hemodynamic response, our results confirm the link between electrical activation and hemodynamic response of the LV during CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Derval et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Congestive heart failure with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block (n=35). Left ventricular pacing at different sites vs. Baseline (AAI) and other pacing strategies was evaluated on Acute hemodynamic response (+dP/dtmax) (p=<0.001). Left ventricular pacing at the site of shortest QRS duration significantly improved +dP/dtmax by 18% compared to baseline (P<0.001), but was inferior to a hemodynamically guided strategy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: