Key result
Percutaneous coronary intervention plus optimal medical therapy achieved 93% quantitative angiographic success but yielded similar overall event rates compared to optimal medical therapy alone.
Why the study?
Does angiographic burden or completeness of revascularization alter the comparative effectiveness of PCI plus optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy alone in stable coronary patients?
Population
Stable coronary patients from the COURAGE trial across Veterans Administration, US non-Veterans…
Comparison
Optimal medical therapy plus percutaneous… vs Optimal medical therapy alone
Design
RCT, randomized
Authors
Loading...
Greater angiographic burden does not identify PCI beneficiaries in stable CAD; confirms OMT sufficiency irrespective of lesion complexity.
RCT
Yes
Does angiographic burden or completeness of revascularization alter the comparative effectiveness of PCI plus optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy alone in stable coronary patients?
In patients with stable coronary artery disease, greater angiographic burden predicts higher overall event rates but does not identify a subgroup that benefits more from an initial strategy of PCI added to optimal medical therapy.
Mancini et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Stable coronary disease. Optimal medical therapy plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Optimal medical therapy alone was evaluated. Percutaneous coronary intervention plus optimal medical therapy achieved 93% quantitative angiographic success but yielded similar overall event rates compared to optimal medical therapy alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: