Key result
Severe stenosis without CMR ischemia is not linked to higher MACE risk than moderate stenosis.
Why the study?
The prognosis of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis and without inducible ischemia on stress CMR remains uncertain.
Does severe coronary artery stenosis compared to moderate stenosis increase the risk of MACE in patients without inducible ischemia on stress CMR?
Cohort (n=169)
No
Does severe coronary artery stenosis compared to moderate stenosis increase the risk of MACE in patients without inducible ischemia on stress CMR?
Effect estimate: HR 1.36 (95% CI 0.73-2.56)
Absolute Event Rate: 27.4% vs 18.8%
p-value: p=0.33
In patients with known coronary artery disease but no inducible ischemia on stress CMR, long-term cardiovascular outcomes are similar and generally favorable regardless of whether the angiographic stenosis is moderate or severe.
Supports ischemia-guided decisions over stenosis severity alone in known CAD; observational data leaves open need for RCT confirmation.
Objective This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) without inducible ischemia in a real-world cohort of patients with known severe coronary artery stenosis. Background The prognosis of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis and without inducible ischemia using stress CMR remains uncertain, even though its identification of functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is excellent. Materials and methods Patients without inducible ischemia and known CAD who underwent stress CMR between February 2015 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. These patients were divided into two groups: group 1 with stenosis of 50%–75% and group 2 with stenosis of >75%. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) [cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)]. Results Real-world data collected from 169 patients with a median age of 69 (60–75) years were included. The median follow-up was 5.5 (IQR 4.1–6.6) years. Events occurred after a mean time of 3.0 ± 2.2 years in group 1 and 3.7 ± 2.0 years in group 2 ( p = 0.35). Sixteen (18.8%) patients in group 1 and 23 (27.4%) patients in group 2 suffered from MACE without a significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.33). In group 2, one cardiac death (1.2%), seven non-fatal MI (8.3%), 15 PCI (17.9%), and one CABG (1.2%) occurred. Conclusion The findings of this pilot study suggest that long-term outcomes in a real-world patient cohort with known severe and moderate coronary artery stenosis but without inducible ischemia were similar. Stress CMR may provide valuable risk stratification in patients with angiographically significant but hemodynamically non-obstructive coronary lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haney et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease with moderate-severe stenosis without inducible ischemia (n=169). Severe coronary artery stenosis (>75%) vs. Moderate coronary artery stenosis (50%-75%) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including cardiac death, non-fatal MI, PCI, or CABG (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.73-2.56, p=0.33). In patients with known coronary artery disease without inducible ischemia on stress CMR, severe stenosis (>75%) did not significantly increase the risk of MACE compared to moderate stenosis (HR 1.36).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: