Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: To investigate the current metformin treatment practice and in particular to examine the consideration given to its contraindications. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 308 consecutive Type 2 diabetic patients (mean age 66+/-11.3 years) previously treated with metformin on an outpatient basis and admitted to a German general hospital during the period from 1 January 1995 to 31 May 1998 because of acute disease or in order to optimize their diabetes management. All patients underwent a basic investigation comprising a documentation of their medical history, a physical examination, an electrocardiogram, and an extensive laboratory profile; 34% also had acute coronary angiography. RESULTS: On admission to hospital, 73% of the patients were found to have contra-indications, risk factors, or intercurrent illnesses necessitating discontinuation of metformin; 51% of these patients had several of these conditions. As major contra-indications to metformin, renal impairment was present in 19% of all patients, heart failure in 25%, respiratory insufficiency in 6.5%, and hepatic impairment in 1.3%. The risk factors to metformin included advanced coronary heart disease in 51%, atrial fibrillation in 9.8%, chronic alcohol abuse in 3.3%, advanced peripheral vascular disease in 2%, and pregnancy in 0.7%. As intercurrent illnesses, cerebral ischaemia occurred in 9.8% under metformin treatment and malignancies were diagnosed in 6.5%. The patients with contra-indications or requiring caution to metformin were significantly older and had previously been treated with more cardiovascular medication than those without such reservations (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the considerable risk of lactic acidosis in the majority of patients, no cases were observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holstein et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: