Key result
Theoretical modeling suggests carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol have similar efficacy for chronic heart failure, but carvedilol directly involves ryanodine receptor 2 and has a higher asthma risk.
Why the study?
Do carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol differ in clinical efficacy (LVEF increase) and adverse effects (HR and FEV1 decrease) when used for chronic heart failure?
Do carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol differ in clinical efficacy (LVEF increase) and adverse effects (HR and FEV1 decrease) when used for chronic heart failure?
Theoretical modeling suggests carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol provide similar LVEF improvements in heart failure, but carvedilol uniquely acts via ryanodine receptor 2, resulting in less bradycardia but higher respiratory risk.
Modeling suggests carvedilol carries higher asthma risk with less bradycardia; leaves open whether these beta-blockers differ clinically in heart failure.
Clinical efficacy and adverse effects of the β-blocking agents, carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol were analyzed theoretically, and then compared quantitatively, for the purpose of determining their proper use for chronic heart failure. Initially, we evaluated occupancy binding to the β1 and β2 receptors (Фssβ1 and Фssβ2) by these drugs. Thereafter, we examined the relationship between Фssβ1 values and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increase rate to determine efficacy. The result showed that the efficacy with carvedilol could be attained with a lower Фssβ1 value than the others. Therefore, we constructed a model under the assumption that β-blocking agents exert both indirect action of LVEF increase through the β1 receptor and direct action on ryanodine receptor 2. Using the model, it was suggested that these drugs have no differences in regard to the efficacy, while it was clarified theoretically that only carvedilol produces an effect that directly involves ryanodine receptor 2 at clinical doses. We also investigated decreases in heart rate and forced expiratory volume in 1 s as adverse effects of β-blocking agents using a ternary complex model. It was indicated that carvedilol is less likely to induce a heart rate decrease. Meanwhile, it was also suggested that the risk of an asthmatic attack was higher for carvedilol at clinical doses. Our results are considered useful for selection of a proper β-blocking agent and its administration at a reasonable dose for successful heart failure therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takayanagi et al. (2017) studied Chronic Heart Failure. Carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol was evaluated on Efficacy (LVEF increase rate) and adverse effects (heart rate decrease, FEV1 decrease). Theoretical modeling suggests carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol have similar efficacy for chronic heart failure, but carvedilol directly involves ryanodine receptor 2 and has a higher asthma risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: