Key result
Multimodal prehabilitation before elective cardiac surgery fails to reduce postoperative complications compared to control.
Why the study?
Prehabilitation improves postoperative outcomes in abdominal surgery, but data in cardiac surgery remain controversial.
Does a 4-6 week multimodal prehabilitation programme reduce the incidence of postoperative complications in patients awaiting elective cardiac surgery?
RCT (n=151)
No
Does a 4-6 week multimodal prehabilitation programme reduce the incidence of postoperative complications in patients awaiting elective cardiac surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 80%
p-value: p=0.968
A 4-6 week multimodal prehabilitation program before elective cardiac surgery improves functional capacity but does not reduce the overall incidence of postoperative complications.
Does not support prehabilitation to reduce complications before cardiac surgery; challenges assumptions and leaves optimal protocols open to research.
BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation has shown efficacy in improving postoperative outcomes in abdominal surgery. Data on cardiac surgery are controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a multimodal prehabilitation programme reduces the rate of postoperative complications after elective cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Single-centre study in a tertiary hospital with inclusion period spanned from March 2018 to June 2021. PATIENTS: One hundred and fifty-one patients, with an expected waiting time before surgery of 6 weeks or more, completed the study. Excluded were those with functional, anatomical or cognitive impairment; cardiac instability; dynamic left ventricle outflow tract obstruction or proven exercise-induced arrhythmias. INTERVENTION: Four to six weeks of a multimodal prehabilitation programme, including exercise training, psychological and nutritional support. MAIN OUTCOME: Incidence of postoperative complications. RESULTS: No differences were found in the rate of postoperative complications (80% in both groups, P = 0.968), most of which were mild, with a Comprehensive Complication Index of 21 and more than 70% with Clavien-Dindo grade I or II. Prehabilitated patients showed a significant improvement in endurance time assessed by a constant-work rate cycling exercise test: preintervention vs . postintervention (301 ± 109 vs . 578 ± 257 s, P = 0.001), and in 6-min walk test (6MWT) (487 ± 77 vs . 504 ± 74 min, P = 0.001). No patients experienced adverse events attributable to the intervention. A sub-analysis restricted to prehabilitated patients who showed a meaningful response to exercise assessed by the 6MWT (increase ≥ 30 m) showed a reduction in the number and severity of postoperative complications, compared to nonresponders (1.1 ± 0.9 vs . 2 ± 2 complications per patient, P = 0.038); and the Comprehensive Complication Index (16 ± 15 vs . 25 ± 19, P = 0.044). CONCLUSION: A multimodal prehabilitation programme before elective cardiac surgery did not reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, when analysis was restricted to meaningful responders to intervention, a significant reduction in postoperative complications and their severity was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03466606).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López-Hernández et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Elective cardiac surgery (n=151). Multimodal prehabilitation programme vs. Control was evaluated on Incidence of postoperative complications (p=0.968). A 4-6 week multimodal prehabilitation programme before elective cardiac surgery did not reduce the incidence of postoperative complications compared to control (80% vs 80%, P=0.968).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: