Key result
Elective cardiac surgery links to improved functional status and routine physical activity at one year.
Why the study?
Preoperative functional status affects surgical outcomes but is not measured by cardiac risk scores, leaving changes in specific functional status aspects after elective cardiac surgery unclear.
Does elective open-heart surgery improve patient-reported functional status over a one-year period?
Observational (n=43)
Single-blind
No
Does elective open-heart surgery improve patient-reported functional status over a one-year period?
p-value: p=0.026
Elective cardiac surgery significantly improves patient-reported functional status and social participation by one year postoperative, though notable improvements are not yet detectable at six weeks.
May support functional benefit at one year; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice without RCTs.
Purpose: Although patient-related factors affect surgical outcomes, preoperative functional status is not measured by any cardiac risk score. Functional status can, however, be objectively measured using validated outcome tools such as the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI). The purpose of this study was to determine 1) if there was a change over time in functional status, as measured by the LLFDI, in patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery, and if so, 2) what specific aspect(s) of functional status changed. Methods: A prospective longitudinal study of one year was conducted on elective cardiac surgery patients (n = 43) using the self-reported LLFDI, which measures Disability Frequency (frequency of participation in social tasks), Disability Limitation (ability to participate in social tasks) and Function Total (ease in performing routine activities). Higher scores indicate increased function and decreased disability. LLFDI scores were compared at three times (preoperative, six-week and one-year postoperative) using repeated measures ANOVA. Post hoc pairwise comparison was conducted for specific interactions. Results: Both Function Total and Disability Frequency significantly changed over time (p = 0.047 and p = 0.013, respectively). Specifically, patients’ function level was significantly higher one-year postoperative compared to preoperative (M difference = +3.48, SE = 1.48, p = 0.026). Likewise, Disability Frequency scores were significantly higher (i.e. more active) at one-year postoperative versus preoperative (M difference= +5.98, SE = 2.19, p = 0.033). Disability Limitation scores were not significantly different between any time points (p > 0.05). Conclusion: By one-year postoperative, patients demonstrated increased ease in their routine physical activities and were more participatory in social life tasks. Individuals who underwent elective cardiac surgery took more than six weeks to detect notable improvement in functional status, which was expected with a sternotomy approach. This study provides support for the use of the LLFDI as an effective tool to capture functional status in the cardiac population. These findings may assist cardiac patients in recovery timeline expectations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacPhedran et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Elective cardiac surgery (n=43). Elective cardiac surgery vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Change in Function Total score (LLFDI) from preoperative to 1-year postoperative (p=0.026). Elective cardiac surgery significantly improved patients' functional status by one-year postoperative, with notable increases in routine physical activity ease and social task participation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: