Key result
Aortic valve or right coronary PVAT attenuation shows no independent link to MACE after TAVI.
Why the study?
Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation is a novel CCTA-based biomarker of coronary inflammation, but whether it provides incremental prognostic value in patients undergoing TAVI remained unknown.
Does quantification of perivascular adipose tissue attenuation (PVAT) using CCTA improve prediction of MACE in patients undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=372)
No
Does quantification of perivascular adipose tissue attenuation (PVAT) using CCTA improve prediction of MACE in patients undergoing TAVI?
Effect estimate: SHR 1.14 (95% CI 0.63-2.05)
p-value: p=0.672
Quantification of perivascular adipose tissue attenuation (PVAT) does not add incremental prognostic value beyond established risk factors for predicting MACE in patients undergoing TAVI.
PVAT attenuation adds no incremental MACE prediction post-TAVI; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter risk stratification.
Aims Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation (PVAT) has emerged as a novel coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based biomarker predicting cardiovascular events by capturing inflammation around the coronary arteries. We assessed whether PVAT adds incremental prognostic value in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods and results A total of 510 patients underwent CCTA imaging prior to TAVI between November 2015 and June 2020 at the Medical University of Vienna. PVAT was obtained from CCTA images and was measured around the right coronary artery [PVAT(RCA)] and the aortic valve [PVAT(valve)]. Following application of exclusion criteria, 372 patients [mean age 80.6 ± 6.8 years; 169 (45%) women] were analysed. Over a median follow-up of 3.0 (IQR 2.5–3.6) years, 52 (14%) individuals experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of non-fatal stroke or myocardial infarction, cardiac death, or vascular intervention). Individuals exhibiting elevated PVAT[valve] displayed a heightened surgical risk according to European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, a lower body mass index, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, prolonged hospitalization following TAVI, and elevated levels of circulating inflammatory markers compared with those in the low PVAT[valve] group (P < 0.05). However, neither PVAT[valve] nor PVAT[RCA] were independently associated with the occurrence of MACE in adjusted multi-variable analyses (PVAT[valve]: sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.14, 95% CI:0.63–2.05, P = 0.672); PVAT[RCA]: SHR 1.16 [95% CI: 0.81–1.66], P = 0.417). Conclusion Measuring PVAT around either the right coronary artery or the aortic valve does not provide additional prognostic value beyond established risk factors for the prediction of MACE in patients undergoing TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donà et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=372). Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation (PVAT) measurement was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of non-fatal stroke or myocardial infarction, cardiac death, or vascular intervention) (SHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.63-2.05, p=0.672). Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation around the aortic valve or right coronary artery was not independently associated with MACE in patients undergoing TAVI (PVAT[valve] SHR 1.14; 95% CI 0.63-2.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: