Key result
Percutaneous aortic valve implantation significantly improved physical (from 28.5 to 41.3) and mental (from 37.8 to 48.3) quality of life scores at 5 months compared to baseline (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does percutaneous aortic valve implantation improve quality of life and functional status in patients with aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=30)
Does percutaneous aortic valve implantation improve quality of life and functional status in patients with aortic stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PAVI with the CoreValve prosthesis provides significant short-term improvements in both physical and mental quality of life as well as functional status in patients with aortic stenosis.
AIMS: To assess the NYHA class and the quality of life (QoL) scores after percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI) with the 18-Fr CoreValve prosthesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2007 until August 2008, 57 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis were evaluated for PAVI. Of these, 30 patients with successfully prosthesis implantation had more than 5-month follow-up. QoL assessment was realized with the SF-12v2 Health-Survey, a simple questionnaire designed for self-administration that provides easily interpretable scales for physical [physical component summary (PCS)] and mental [mental component summary (MCS)] health. The questionnaire was administered before and 5 months after PAVI. All 30 patients had a marked upgrading in haemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters (peak-to-peak gradient from 64 +/- 23 to 2 +/- 0.4; P < 0.001; aortic valve area index from 0.3 +/- 0.1 to 0.9 +/- 0.3; P < 0.001), with an improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at discharge and after 5 months. Mean pre-operative SF-12v2 scores showed a severe impairment of perceived quality of life compared with general Italian population >75 years, both for physical (PCS-baseline 28.5 vs. 37.9, P < 0.001) and mental scores (MCS-baseline 37.8 vs. 45.4, P < 0.001). After 5 months, a striking improvement in both scores (PCS 41.3-MCS 48.3; P < 0.001) was observed. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results show a marked short-term improvement in functional status and physical and mental health in patients underwent PAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ussia et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in aortic stenosis (n=30). Percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI) vs. Baseline was evaluated on NYHA class and quality of life (QoL) scores (SF-12v2) (p=<0.001). Percutaneous aortic valve implantation significantly improved physical (from 28.5 to 41.3) and mental (from 37.8 to 48.3) quality of life scores at 5 months compared to baseline (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: