Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 2012EuroIntervention

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation significantly improved quality of life at two years, with mean SF36-physical scores increasing from 31.9 to 51.5 (p<0.0001).

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does TAVI improve long-term quality of life in high-risk surgical candidates?

Population

100 consecutive high-risk surgical candidates undergoing TAVI with at least two years' follow-up. Mean log…

Comparison

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using… vs Preoperative baseline

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

2 years

Key result

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation significantly improved quality of life at two years, with mean SF36-physical scores increasing from 31.9 to 51.5 (p<0.0001).

Authors

Maurizio Taramasso
Maurizio TaramassoInterventional / Structural Cardiology
Azeem Latib
Azeem LatibInterventional / Structural Cardiology
MCMicaela CioniIstituto Giannina Gaslini

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports TAVI for sustained QoL gains in high-risk patients; extends observational data but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=100)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does TAVI improve long-term quality of life in high-risk surgical candidates?

P
Population
100 consecutive high-risk surgical candidates (mean age 79.7 years, 46% female) undergoing TAVI, evaluated for quality of life changes up to two years post-procedure.
E
Exposure
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using Edwards SAPIEN (n=67) or CoreValve (n=33)
C
Comparator
Preoperative baseline (before-and-after comparison)
O
Outcome
Changes in quality of life (QoL) at two years' follow-up, evaluated with the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36v2) and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaires (MLHFQ)patient reported

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 51.5% vs 31.9%

p-value: p=<0.0001

TAVI in high-risk surgical candidates provides significant and sustained improvements in physical and mental quality of life up to two years post-procedure.

Cite This Study

Taramasso et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in High-risk surgical candidates undergoing TAVI (n=100). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Quality of life (SF36-physical score) (p=<0.0001). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation significantly improved quality of life at two years, with mean SF36-physical scores increasing from 31.9 to 51.5 (p<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9579e06a42edee3f2cb26fhttps://doi.org/10.4244/eijv8i4a68
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quality-of-life in elderly patients one year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis2011 · 55 citations
  2. 2Short- and intermediate-term improvement of patient quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-centre study2014 · 34 citations
  3. 3Quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical replacement in high-risk elderly patients2012 · 14 citations
  4. 4Quality of life in patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an analysis from the INTERVENT project2023 · 7 citations
  5. 5Twelve-Month Quality of Life Improvement and All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement2016 · 17 citations