Why the study?
Does TAVI improve long-term quality of life in high-risk surgical candidates?
Population
100 consecutive high-risk surgical candidates undergoing TAVI with at least two years' follow-up. Mean log…
Comparison
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using… vs Preoperative baseline
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
2 years
Key result
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation significantly improved quality of life at two years, with mean SF36-physical scores increasing from 31.9 to 51.5 (p<0.0001).
Authors
Loading...
Supports TAVI for sustained QoL gains in high-risk patients; extends observational data but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Cohort (n=100)
No
Does TAVI improve long-term quality of life in high-risk surgical candidates?
Absolute Event Rate: 51.5% vs 31.9%
p-value: p=<0.0001
TAVI in high-risk surgical candidates provides significant and sustained improvements in physical and mental quality of life up to two years post-procedure.
Taramasso et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in High-risk surgical candidates undergoing TAVI (n=100). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Quality of life (SF36-physical score) (p=<0.0001). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation significantly improved quality of life at two years, with mean SF36-physical scores increasing from 31.9 to 51.5 (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: