Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze physician-assessed asthma control and care compared with current guidelines criteria, in a cohort of patients from a high (HMR) vs. low asthma-related morbidity region (LMR), as determined by a large-scale populational survey (asthma cartography). DESIGN: Analysis of questionnaires provided by 47 primary care physicians and asthmatic patients (HMR: 74; LMR: 73). RESULTS: Asthma control was often suboptimal in both regions. In both regions, asthma control, the pattern of prescriptions for asthma, patient compliance, and referral for asthma education were similar; 32% of patients had been referred for asthma education, whereas 65% wanted to know more about their asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Results of regional/local cohort studies differ from those of a "population cartography," the former probably more likely reflecting individual medical practices of physicians interested in taking part in such studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boulet et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: