Why the study?
When multiple stenoses occur in the same coronary artery, the degree to which they affect each other is not well understood.
How does the presence of a secondary downstream stenosis affect pressure behavior and physiological indices (FFR, RFR, iFR, hSR) compared to a single stenosis in an in vitro coronary flow rig?
How does the presence of a secondary downstream stenosis affect pressure behavior and physiological indices (FFR, RFR, iFR, hSR) compared to a single stenosis in an in vitro coronary flow rig?
In an in vitro model, tandem stenoses interact to alter coronary physiological indices, suggesting that a secondary downstream stenosis can lessen the overall pressure drop and requires careful interpretation of FFR and non-hyperemic pressure ratios.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tandem stenoses may confound FFR/iFR readings; leaves open clinical validation of interaction effects.
Coronary artery disease, associated with significant mortality and morbidity, is caused by atherosclerotic stenoses (blood vessel cholesterol blockages) obstructing coronary blood flow. Stenoses may be widespread, with several occurring in one coronary artery. Where multiple stenoses occur in the same coronary artery, the degree to which the stenoses affect each other is not necessarily well understood. This research aims to investigate the pressure behaviour across pairs of stenoses using a purpose-built coronary flow rig. Additionally, for the first time, the effect of an additional stenosis on measurements of fractional flow reserve (FFR), resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) and hyperaemic stenosis resistance (hSR) were compared in a controlled environment. Results demonstrate that having a secondary, less severe, stenosis downstream can lessen the overall pressure drop and cause a pressure increase across the second stenosis. The effect of the second stenosis appears to be negligible as the separation increases. All indices are altered by the presence of an additional stenosis. However, FFR, RFR and hSR all display similar behaviour, whereas hSR appears to be more greatly altered, when compared with a single equivalent stenosis. Finally, the pressure behaviour is used to propose a separation range, beyond which the two stenoses should be treated as separate blockages. Findings suggest that the presence of a second stenosis alters the flow and pressure behaviour in a stenosed vessel, and may even be of potential benefit in some cases, although further research is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atkins et al. (2025) studied Coronary artery disease. Tandem stenoses vs. Single equivalent stenosis was evaluated on Pressure behaviour and physiological indices (FFR, RFR, iFR, hSR).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: