Key result
Review summarizes key risk scores to estimate mortality, ischemic, and bleeding risks in ACS.
Why the study?
Multiple risk scores have been developed over the last decades for ACS patients across different time points, motivating a review summarizing the most relevant scores.
This review summarizes the most relevant risk scores used to guide clinical management and treatment strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome across different time points.
May aid ACS risk stratification across time points; leaves open prospective validation of newer scores in contemporary cohorts.
Risk scores are widely used in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) prior to treatment decision-making at different points in time. At initial hospital presentation, risk scores are used to assess the risk for developing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and can guide clinicians in either discharging the patients at low risk or swiftly admitting and treating the patients at high risk for MACE. During hospital admission, risk assessment is performed to estimate mortality, residual ischemic and bleeding risk to guide further in-hospital management (e.g., timing of coronary angiography) and post-discharge management (e.g., duration of dual antiplatelet therapy). In the months and years following ACS, long term risk can also be assessed to evaluate current treatment strategies (e.g., intensify or reduce pharmaceutical treatment options). As multiple risk scores have been developed over the last decades, this review summarizes the most relevant risk scores used in ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2020) conducted a review in Acute Coronary Syndrome. Risk scores was evaluated. This review summarizes the most relevant risk scores used in patients with acute coronary syndrome to estimate mortality, ischemic, and bleeding risks and guide clinical management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: