Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-dose melphalan has induced remissions in about 40% of patients with refractory myeloma, but the mortality has been high, at about 20%, due to complications of prolonged granulocytopenia. In an attempt to stimulate earlier granulocyte recovery, recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was administered subcutaneously to 23 patients with refractory myeloma who had been treated with melphalan at a high dose of 100 mg/m2. Thirty-nine percent of patients achieved marked tumor cytoreduction by at least 75%, 2 died within 2 months from infectious complications during severe neutropenia; and median durations of relapse-free and overall survival were 7 and 10+ months, respectively. The nine patients presenting with both advanced age over 50 years and a long history of prior therapy of over 1 year required significantly longer median times of 31 days for granulocytes and of 63 days for platelets to reach safe levels of at least 500/microL and 50,000/microL, respectively, than the 14 remaining patients who had none or only one of these adverse features (21 and 26 days, respectively). In a historic control of 43 patients treated previously with high-dose melphalan but without GM-CSF, hematologic recovery to the aforementioned levels of granulocytes and platelets proceeded over almost 5 weeks, regardless of age and prior treatment exposure. Thus GM-CSF seems to hasten marrow recovery, especially in patients with adequate normal marrow stem-cell reserve as defined by younger age or less prior therapy. While not shortening the duration of neutropenia, GM-CSF dose increments (from 0.25 to 0.5 to 0.75 mg/m2) increased the incidence of severe toxicity from 0% to almost 40%, especially among older patients. These results support the usefulness of low-dose GM-CSF (0.25 mg/m2) in stimulating marrow recovery in selected patients with adequate marrow reserve treated with high-dose melphalan for refractory multiple myeloma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barlogie et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: