How does mass-count syntax affect word meaning? Many theorists have proposed that count nouns denote individuals, whereas mass nouns do not However, studies of quantity judgments in 4-year-olds and adults demonstrate that some mass nouns (furniture) do denote individuals This is problematic for bootstrapping theories that posit one-to-one syntax-semantics mappings (individual count; nonindividual mass; Bloom, 1999), unless mass nouns that denote individuals are late-learned exceptions to mappings. This article investigates this possibility in 3-year-olds and adults using 2 methods: word extension and quantity judgment. Both methods indicate that novel mass nouns can denote individuals in both age groups, and thus fail to support simplified syntax-semantics mappings. Also, differences between word extension and quantity judgment raise the possibility that the tasks measure different underlying knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barner et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: