Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 1953CirculationOpen Access

A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Blood-Pressure Determinations

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LRL. RobertsEastern HealthJSJosiah SmileyUniversity of MichiganGMGeorge W. ManningUniversity of Oxford

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports Korotkoff phase 4 for diastolic BP assessment; leaves open need for modern validation before practice change.

Key Points

  • To compare the effectiveness of direct and indirect methods of measuring blood pressure, particularly focusing on their relationship to diastolic pressure.
  • Statistical analysis of data comparing direct and indirect methods of blood pressure determination.
  • Assessment of the fourth phase of Korotkow sounds in relation to diastolic pressure measurements.
  • Muffling of Korotkow sounds has a closer and more consistent relationship with directly measured diastolic pressure.
  • Recommendations are made to adopt muffling of sounds as the standard measure for diastolic pressure.

Cite This Study

Roberts et al. (1953) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a14b23d18abc81f8aa5ffc2https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.8.2.232
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Indirect and Direct Methods of Measuring Arterial Blood Pressure1954 · 196 citations
  2. 2Biases in the measurement of arterial pressure1984 · 23 citations
  3. 3Indirect Blood Pressure Measurements: A Matter of Interpretation1979 · 12 citations
  4. 4Evaluation of a New Non-Invasive Semiautomatic Blood Pressure Monitoring Device1987 · 5 citations
  5. 5Critique of Indirect Diastolic End Point1967 · 19 citations