Universal vs. risk factor‐based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: detection rates, gestation at diagnosis and outcome

AIMS: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcome. Screening for GDM is therefore recommended but the best screening method remains controversial. This prospective, randomized study compared a risk factor-based screening programme with a universally based one. METHODS: Subjects were randomized at booking to one of two groups: the risk factor group had a 3-h 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 32 weeks if any risk factor for GDM was present; the universal group had a 50-g glucose challenge test performed and if their plasma glucose at 1 h was > or = 7.8 mmol/l, a formal 3-h 100-g OGTT was then performed. RESULTS: Universal screening detected a prevalence of GDM of 2.7%, significantly more than the 1.45% detected in the risk factor screened group (P<0.03). Universal screening facilitated earlier diagnosis than risk factor screening - mean gestation 30 +/- 2.6 weeks vs. 33 +/- 3.7 weeks (P<0.05). A higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery at term, and lower rates of macrosomia, Caesarean section, prematurity, pre-eclampsia and admission to neonatal intensive care unit were observed in the universally screened, early diagnosis group. CONCLUSIONS: Universal screening for GDM is superior to risk factor based screening-detecting more cases, facilitating early diagnosis and is associated with improved pregnancy outcome.