Key result
Fragmented QRS on ECG had higher sensitivity and accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease in the LAD, LCX, and RCA compared to pathological Q wave and ST-segment depression (P < 0.05).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) can predict the presence and extent of CAD in Egyptian patients with ACS.
Does the presence of fragmented QRS on ECG predict significant coronary artery disease better than pathological Q waves or ST-segment depression in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=74)
Does the presence of fragmented QRS on ECG predict significant coronary artery disease better than pathological Q waves or ST-segment depression in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
p-value: p=< 0.05
Fragmented QRS on ECG is a simple and accurate marker for predicting significant coronary artery disease in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome.
Background: Fragmented QRS (fQRS) is derived from regional myocardial fibrosis/scar and ischemia, which cause heterogeneous myocardial electrical activation. We aimed to detect if the presence of fQRS can predict the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and to which extent in Egyptian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Materials and Methods: Seventy-four patients with ACS were divided into two groups according to the presence of fQRS in the initial and follow-up electrocardiography (ECG), they underwent clinical examination, full history for CAD risks, echocardiographic study, cardiac enzymes, lipid profile estimation, and coronary angiographic study. Results: FQRS, when compared with pathological Q wave and ST-segment depression for diagnosis CAD; it has higher sensitivity (49.0% vs. 36.7% and 17.3%) for left anterior descending artery (LAD), (66.7% vs. 14.3% and 9.5%) for left circumflex (LCX), (67.5% vs. 27.5% and 12.5%) for right coronary artery (RCA), more specific (92.00% vs. 78.2% and 80%) for LAD, higher positive predictive value (45% vs. 39.2% and 35.9%) for LAD, (77% vs. 50% and 22%) for LCX, (90% vs. 73.3% and 38.5%) for RCA, more accuracy (63.5% vs. 51.4% and 41.9%) for LAD, (85.1% vs. 71.6% and 64.8%) for LCX, and (78.4% vs. 55.4% and 41.9%) for RCA with a statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Presence of fQRS in ECG is a good, simple, applicable positive test to predict the presence of significant CAD in the Egyptian patients with ACS in the emergency room, even in those without enzyme elevation but have “fQRS.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Dosouky et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (n=74). Fragmented QRS (fQRS) on ECG vs. Pathological Q wave and ST-segment depression was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) (p=< 0.05). Fragmented QRS on ECG had higher sensitivity and accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease in the LAD, LCX, and RCA compared to pathological Q wave and ST-segment depression (P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: