Key result
Multimodal AI combining ECG and clinical features beats ECG alone for predicting LVAs with ~0.82 AUROC.
Why the study?
The authors aimed to develop an AI algorithm to accurately predict the presence of left atrial low-voltage areas based on sinus rhythm ECGs in patients with AF.
Does a multimodal AI algorithm integrating sinus rhythm ECGs and clinical features improve the prediction of left atrial low-voltage areas in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to ECG alone or clinical scores?
Observational (n=1,225)
Yes
Does a multimodal AI algorithm integrating sinus rhythm ECGs and clinical features improve the prediction of left atrial low-voltage areas in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to ECG alone or clinical scores?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.816
A multimodal AI algorithm combining sinus rhythm ECGs and clinical features can accurately predict left atrial low-voltage areas in AF patients, outperforming traditional clinical risk scores.
May aid noninvasive LA low-voltage prediction in AF; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Aims We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm capable of accurately predicting the presence of left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) based on sinus rhythm electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results The study included 1133 patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation procedures, with a total of 1787 12-lead ECG images analysed. Artificial intelligence-based algorithms were used to construct models for predicting the presence of LVAs. The DR-FLASH and APPLE clinical scores for LVAs prediction were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calibration curve were used to evaluate model performance. Multicentre validation included 92 AF patients from five centres, with a total of 174 ECGs. The data obtained from the participants were split into training (n = 906), validation (n = 113), and test sets (n = 114). Low-voltage areas were detected in 47.4% of all participants. Using ECG alone, the convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.704, outperforming both the DR-FLASH score (AUROC = 0.601) and the APPLE score (AUROC = 0.589). Two multimodal AI models, which integrated ECG images and clinical features, demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (AUROC 0.816 and 0.796 for the CNN-Multimodal and CNN-Random Forest-Multimodal models, respectively). Our models also performed well in the multicentre validation dataset (AUROC 0.711, 0.785, and 0.879 for the ECG alone, CNN-Multimodal, and CNN-Random Forest-Multimodal models, respectively). Conclusion The multimodal AI algorithm, which integrated ECG images and clinical features, predicted the presence of LVAs with a higher degree of accuracy than ECG alone and the clinical LVA scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,225). Multimodal artificial intelligence algorithm (CNN-Multimodal) vs. ECG alone and clinical scores (DR-FLASH, APPLE) was evaluated on Prediction of the presence of left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) (AUROC 0.816). A multimodal AI algorithm integrating ECG images and clinical features predicted left atrial low-voltage areas with higher accuracy (AUROC 0.816) than ECG alone (AUROC 0.704) or clinical scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: