Key result
Early initiation of direct oral anticoagulants after atrial fibrillation-related acute ischemic stroke appears safe with low rates of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, though confirmation from ongoing randomized trials is required.
Why the study?
The optimal timing of DOAC initiation after AF-related ischemic stroke remains an area of clinical equipoise, as pivotal trials excluded patients in the early post-stroke period and current guidelines rely on empiric expert opinion.
Does early anticoagulation reduce recurrent ischemic stroke without increasing hemorrhagic transformation in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischemic stroke?
Does early anticoagulation reduce recurrent ischemic stroke without increasing hemorrhagic transformation in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischemic stroke?
While early DOAC initiation after AF-related ischemic stroke shows promise, the optimal timing remains an area of clinical equipoise pending the results of larger ongoing randomized trials.
Early DOAC initiation after AF stroke may be safe but should not change practice; leaves optimal timing open pending RCTs.
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke are at high risk for stroke recurrence. Early anticoagulation may reduce the risk of recurrent events but is usually avoided due to the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Current guidelines are based on empiric expert opinion. The assumed risk of HT is based on historical data from an older generation of anticoagulants. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to older anticoagulants. However, the optimal timing of DOAC initiation after AF-related ischemic stroke has remained an area of clinical equipoise, as the pivotal phase III trials did not include patients in the early period after ischemic stroke. Multiple prospective studies and a few smaller randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of early versus delayed DOAC initiation have been completed. These studies have reported promising results of early DOAC initiation after acute ischemic stroke. However, a standardized documentation of HT rates on follow-up imaging with objective assessment criteria is missing from most of these studies. Larger randomized trials of early versus delayed DOAC are ongoing. A literature review was performed using keywords and Medical Subject Headings in MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar databases. For each relevant paper, the bibliography was scrutinized for other relevant articles and journals. In this article, we review the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke and HT in patients with AF, pathophysiology, classification, predictors, natural history, and outcomes of HT and discuss the studies of early anticoagulation after AF-related ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alrohimi et al. (2022) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and acute ischemic stroke. Early direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Delayed DOACs or Vitamin K Antagonists was evaluated. Early initiation of direct oral anticoagulants after atrial fibrillation-related acute ischemic stroke appears safe with low rates of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, though confirmation from ongoing randomized trials is required.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: