Key result
Having five ADL disabilities links to ~6.8-fold higher in-hospital mortality among chronic dialysis patients.
Why the study?
The impact of admission functional status on outcomes in patients receiving dialysis is not fully understood.
Does the number of ADL disabilities at admission increase in-hospital mortality in elderly patients receiving chronic dialysis?
Cohort (n=104,557)
Yes
Does the number of ADL disabilities at admission increase in-hospital mortality in elderly patients receiving chronic dialysis?
Admission functional status decline, measured by ADL disabilities, is strongly and dose-dependently associated with increased in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs in elderly dialysis patients.
ADL count at admission may refine mortality risk stratification in dialysis patients; leaves open prospective validation and intervention effects.
Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly affects activities of daily living (ADLs) before and after the initiation of dialysis, particularly in elderly individuals. However, the impact of admission functional status on dialysis patients' outcome is not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the number of ADL disabilities usually measured for all patients hospitalized in Japan on in-hospital outcome for dialysis patients. Methods: Using an inpatient administrative claims database, we included 104,557 admissions of patients undergoing chronic dialysis aged 65 years and above from 2012 to 2014. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality (evaluated using logistic regression models), and the secondary outcomes were length of stay and care cost. Results: The mean age of the participants was 74.0 ± 6.2 years, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 21.8 ± 3.9, 31% needed assistance for one or more of five basic ADLs (feeding, transferring, going to toilet, dressing, and bathing) at admission, and 3.5% (n = 3,701) died after hospitalization. After adjusting for confounding factors, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals) of death for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 ADL disabilities were 1.43 (1.19-1.70), 2.04 (1.71-2.45), 2.58 (2.19-3.04), 3.74 (3.35-4.17), and 6.83 (6.29-7.41) versus a complete independence, respectively. The increasing number of ADL disabilities was also associated with greater length of stay and costs. Risk stratification by age, admission functional status, and BMI showed an 18-mortality risk matrix with a maximal risk of a 15.5-higher OR for lean patients aged ≥75 years with severe ADL disability compared with that for patients aged <75 years with middle BMI and no ADL disability on admission. Conclusions: Admission functional status decline significantly increases in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs. Routine assessment of functional status can facilitate the risk prediction of dialysis patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mandai et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Chronic dialysis (n=104,557). ADL disabilities at admission vs. Complete independence (0 ADL disabilities) was evaluated on In-hospital all-cause mortality (OR 6.83, 95% CI 6.29-7.41). Having 5 ADL disabilities at admission significantly increased the risk of in-hospital mortality among chronic dialysis patients compared to complete independence (OR 6.83; 95% CI 6.29-7.41).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: