Key result
Congenital heart disease patients show higher RV ECV on CMR T1 mapping versus healthy controls.
Why the study?
Evaluating right ventricular extracellular volume is challenging due to thin walls and trabeculation, leaving the feasibility of these measurements in congenital heart disease uncertain.
Does a novel line of interest (LOI) tool correlate with standard region of interest (ROI) methods for measuring right ventricular extracellular volume in patients with congenital heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
No
Does a novel line of interest (LOI) tool correlate with standard region of interest (ROI) methods for measuring right ventricular extracellular volume in patients with congenital heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.31% vs 0.28%
p-value: p=0.009
A novel line of interest tool simplifies right ventricular extracellular volume measurements on CMR T1 mapping and correlates strongly with standard region of interest methods in patients with congenital heart disease.
May signal RV remodeling in congenital heart disease; leaves open prognostic utility pending longitudinal validation.
The right ventricle´s (RV) characteristics—thin walls and trabeculation—make it challenging to evaluate extracellular volume (ECV). We aimed to assess the feasibility of RV ECV measurements in congenital heart disease (CHD), and to introduce a novel ECV analysis tool. Patients (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 17) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping in midventricular short axis (SAX) and transverse orientation (TRANS). Regions of interest (ROIs) were evaluated with regard to image quality and maximum RV wall thickness per ROI in pixels. ECV from plane ROIs was compared with values obtained with a custom-made tool that derives the mean T1 values from a “line of interest” (LOI) centered in the RV wall. In CHD, average image quality was good (no artifacts in the RV, good contrast between blood/myocardium), and RV wall thickness was 1–2 pixels. RV ECV was not quantifiable in 4/39 patients due to insufficient contrast or wall thickness < 1 pixel. RV myocardium tended to be more clearly delineated in SAX than TRANS. ECV from ROIs and corresponding LOIs correlated strongly in both directions (SAX/TRANS: r = 0.97/0.87, p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, RV ECV can be assessed if image quality allows sufficient distinction between myocardium and blood, and RV wall thickness per ROI is ≥ 1 pixel. T1 maps in SAX are recommended for RV ECV analysis. LOI application simplifies RV ECV measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Wakeel‐Marquard et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Congenital heart disease (n=56). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Right ventricular extracellular volume (RV ECV) in short axis orientation (p=0.009). Right ventricular extracellular volume measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping was significantly higher in patients with congenital heart disease compared to healthy controls (0.31 vs 0.28, p=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: