Key result
DOACs provide a more effective and convenient option than LMWH for cancer-associated VTE.
Why the study?
Despite advances with direct oral anticoagulants in cancer-associated thrombosis, unmet needs persist regarding bleeding risk, drug-drug interactions, renal impairment, and long-term persistence.
This review highlights the shift towards DOACs for cancer-associated thrombosis while identifying remaining challenges and the potential future role of Factor XI inhibitors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DOACs may be preferred over LMWH for cancer-associated VTE; leaves open questions on unmet needs and Factor XI inhibitors.
Cancer-associated thrombosis, with the incidence rising over the years, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Recent advances in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) include the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which provide a more convenient and effective option than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Nonetheless, important unmet needs remain including an increased risk of bleeding in certain patient subgroups such as those with gastroesophageal cancer, concerns about drug-drug interactions, and management of patients with severe renal impairment. Although DOACs are more convenient than LMWH, persistence can decline over time. Factor XI inhibitors have potential safety advantages over DOACs because factor XI appears to be essential for thrombosis but not hemostasis. In phase II trials, some factor XI inhibitors were superior to enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after knee replacement surgery without increasing the risk of bleeding. Ongoing trials are assessing the efficacy and safety of factor XI inhibitors for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cancer-associated thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and Factor XI inhibitors vs. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants provide a more convenient and effective option than low-molecular-weight heparin for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, though important unmet needs remain.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: