Key result
Coronary slow flow was associated with significantly increased ventricular repolarization markers, including a prolonged Tp-e interval (117 ± 21 ms vs 96 ± 16 ms, P<0.001) compared to controls.
Why the study?
Are ventricular repolarization markers (Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, Tp-e/QTc ratio) increased in patients with coronary slow flow compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=101)
Are ventricular repolarization markers (Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, Tp-e/QTc ratio) increased in patients with coronary slow flow compared to controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patients with coronary slow flow exhibit increased Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and Tp-e/QTc ratio, suggesting a potential mechanism for increased ventricular arrhythmogenesis in this population.
BACKGROUND: Coronary slow flow (CSF) is characterized by normal or near-normal coronary arteries with delayed opacification of the distal vasculature that it may cause angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, life-threatening arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. The Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and Tp-e/QTc ratio are also known as predictors of ventricular arrhythmogenesis. The aim of this study was to assess ventricular repolarization in patients with CSF by using Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and Tp-e/QTc ratio. METHODS: This study included 50 patients with CSF and 51 control subjects. Coronary flow rates of all subjects were documented by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count (TFC). Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and Tp-e/QTc ratio were measured from the 12-lead electrocardiogram. These parameters were compared between groups. RESULTS: In electrocardiographic parameters analysis, QT, QTc, QTd, and QTcd were significantly increased in CSF patients compared with the control subjects (P < 0.001, P = 0.019, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). The Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and Tp-e/QTc ratio in the CSF patients were significantly higher than those in the control subjects (Tp-e: 117 ± 21 milliseconds [ms] vs 96 ± 16 ms, P < 0.001; Tp-e/QT: 0.30 ± 0.06 vs 0.27 ± 0.06, P = 0.005; Tp-e/QTc: 0.27 ± 0.06 vs 0.24 ± 0.05, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, increased Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio were associated with CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that when compared to the control subjects, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and Tp-e/QTc were significantly increased in the CSF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaman et al. (2014) conducted a case-control in Coronary slow flow (n=101). Coronary slow flow vs. Control subjects was evaluated on Tp-e interval (ms) (p=<0.001). Coronary slow flow was associated with significantly increased ventricular repolarization markers, including a prolonged Tp-e interval (117 ± 21 ms vs 96 ± 16 ms, P<0.001) compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: