Key result
Conventional RFA linked to higher cardiac tamponade rates, with female sex increasing risk ~197%.
Why the study?
Pulmonary vein isolation is a cornerstone invasive treatment for atrial fibrillation with severe complications reported in 1-3% of patients, prompting a comparison of complications and follow-up outcomes.
Do complications and follow-up outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation differ by ablation technique and sex in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=13,823)
Yes
Do complications and follow-up outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation differ by ablation technique and sex in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.8% vs 0.3%
p-value: p=≤0.001
In a large national registry, pulmonary vein isolation complication rates were low overall (3.6%), but varied by ablation technique and were significantly higher in female patients.
Associated with higher tamponade risk for conventional RF and women; leaves open randomized confirmation of technique choice.
AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone of the invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation. Severe complications are reported in 1-3% of patients. This study aims to compare complications and follow-up outcome of PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The data were extracted from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Procedural and follow-up outcomes in patients treated with conventional radiofrequency (C-RF), multielectrode phased RF (Ph-RF), or cryoballoon (CB) ablation from 2012 to 2017 were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify variables associated with complications and repeat ablations. In total, 13 823 patients (69% male) were included. The reported complication incidence was 3.6%. Patients treated with C-RF developed more cardiac tamponades (C-RF 0.8% vs. Ph-RF 0.3% vs. CB 0.3%, P ≤ 0.001) and vascular complications (C-RF 1.7% vs. Ph-RF 1.2% vs. CB 1.3%, P ≤ 0.001). Ph-RF was associated with fewer bleeding complications (C-RF: 1.0% vs. Ph-RF: 0.4% vs. CB: 0.7%, P = 0.020). Phrenic nerve palsy mainly occurred in patients treated with CB (C-RF: 0.1% vs. Ph-RF: 0.2% vs. CB: 1.5%, P ≤ 0.001). In total, 18.4% of patients were referred for repeat ablation within 1 year. Female sex, age, and CHA2DS2-VASc were independent risk factors for cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications, with an adjusted OR for female patients of 2.97 (95% CI 1.98-4.45) and 2.02 (95% CI 1.03-4.00) respectively. CONCLUSION: The reported complication rate during PVI was low. Patients treated with C-RF ablation were more likely to develop cardiac tamponades and vascular complications. Female sex was associated with more cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mol et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=13,823). Conventional radiofrequency (C-RF), multielectrode phased RF (Ph-RF), or cryoballoon (CB) ablation vs. Comparison between ablation techniques was evaluated on Cardiac tamponade (p=≤0.001). Conventional radiofrequency ablation had higher rates of cardiac tamponade (0.8% vs 0.3%, P≤0.001), while female sex was an independent risk factor for tamponade (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.98-4.45).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: