The precision required for neural net algorithms is an important question facing hardware architects. The authors present simulation results that compare floating point and limited precision integer back-propagation simulators. Data sets from the neural network benchmark suite maintained by Carnegie Mellon University were used to compare integer and floating point implementations. The simulation results indicate that integer computation works quite well for the back-propagation algorithm. In all cases except one, the limited precision integer simulations performed as well as the floating point simulations. The effect of reducing the precision of the trained weights is also reported.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holt et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: