Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: In the midst of a global refugee crisis, addressing mental health is critical for refugee health care delivery. Understanding efficacy of mental health interventions is more important than ever.Aims: In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy of comprehensive mental health and psychosocial support services for refugees in Gaza by comparing intended stigmatizing behavior toward mental health disorders between two health centers (HCs)(Saftawi and Nasser).Methods: One year after these services by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for Palestine Refugees in the Near East were implemented at Saftawi HC, a randomly selected sample of HC patrons (n = 205) from Saftawi, and a comparable number from a control HC (n = 203 at Nasser) completed the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS) regarding stigma towards mental illnesses. Multivariable linear regressions were used to determine the impact of these services in the HC on attitudes against mental health.Results: Saftawi respondents endorsed significantly less intended stigmatizing behavior compared to Nasser respondents (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly less intended stigmatizing behavior at Saftawi compared to Nasser (p < 0.01) while controlling for demographic covariables.Conclusions: UNRWA primary care services and education implemented for refugees in Gaza was associated with reduced stigmatizing behavior toward mental health, which can help guide efficacious mental health care interventions within the Palestine refugee community and in other simiilar communities.
Bruno et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: