Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows perceived weight discrimination is linked to elevated cardiometabolic markers in adults with diabetes, suggesting weight stigma impairs physical and mental health.
BACKGROUND: Weight discrimination is associated with negative psychological and physical health. However, in those with diabetes, a high risk-group for weight discrimination, this association is not well-understood. This study examined the extent to which weight discrimination is longitudinally associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with diabetes. METHODS: Participants were 833 people (aged ≥ 50 years) with diabetes at wave 5 (2010/2011) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Perceived weight discrimination was measured at wave 5. Participants provided outcome data at waves 6 (2012/2013) and 8/9 (2016/17, 2018/2019) including psychological (depressive symptoms), anthropometric (body mass index [BMI]), and cardiometabolic biomarkers (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c], triglycerides, total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein [HDL] ratio, fibrinogen). Linear regressions controlled for baseline age, sex, wealth, BMI, and baseline measures of the outcome of interest. RESULTS: Perceived weight discrimination was associated with greater depressive symptoms (B = 1.40, p < 0.001), higher triglycerides (B = 0.50, p = 0.014), poorer total cholesterol/HDL ratio (B = 0.59, p = 0.005), and greater fibrinogen (B = 0.25, p = 0.025) at wave 6. Effects were attenuated in fully adjusted models and at wave 8/9. Findings were not replicated using a general discrimination measure suggesting results are specific to weight discrimination. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that weight discrimination has deleterious effects on a range of cardiometabolic risk factors in those living with diabetes, at least in the short-term. Interventions targeted to help individuals with diabetes cope with weight stigma are warranted to help reduce the risk of future diabetes-related complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poole et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: