Key result
Early pharmacologic cardioversion fails to improve 4-week sinus rhythm maintenance versus non-early cardioversion in recent-onset AF.
Why the study?
Whether early pharmacologic cardioversion is necessary for recent-onset atrial fibrillation is controversial, and prior meta-analyses were limited to evaluating outcomes within 24 hours without sufficiently considering longer follow-up.
Does early pharmacologic cardioversion improve sinus rhythm maintenance within 4-weeks in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation compared to non-early cardioversion?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,395)
Does early pharmacologic cardioversion improve sinus rhythm maintenance within 4-weeks in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation compared to non-early cardioversion?
Effect estimate: OR 1.37 (95% CI 0.90-2.09)
p-value: p=0.95
Early pharmacologic cardioversion for recent-onset atrial fibrillation improves short-term sinus rhythm maintenance (up to 1 week) but offers no significant advantage over non-early cardioversion at 4 weeks, while increasing the risk of adverse events.
Early pharmacologic cardioversion lacks support for 4-week sinus rhythm maintenance in recent-onset AF; challenges shorter-term efficacy assumptions and leaves optimal timing open for further study.
Background: Whether early pharmacologic cardioversion is necessary for recent-onset atrial fibrillation is still controversial. Current meta-analyses were limited to evaluating the effects within 24 h without sufficient considering longer follow-up outcomes. We aimed to compare the effect of early pharmacologic cardioversion and non-early cardioversion in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation within 4-weeks of follow-up. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Clinicaltrialsregister. eu for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before November 2021 comparing early pharmacologic cardioversion and non-early cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation and synthesized data in accordance with PRISMA-Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-Analysis (NMA). Early pharmacological cardioversion referred to immediate cardioversion with antiarrhythmic drugs (i.e., amiodarone, propafenone, flecainide, tedisamil, vernakalant, vanoxerine, and sotalol) upon admission, while non-early cardioversion involved the administration of rate-control or placebo medication without immediate cardioversion. Results: 16 RCTs with 2,395 patients were included. Compared to non-early cardioversion, a systematic review showed that early pharmacologic cardioversion resulted in a higher probability of sinus rhythm maintenance within 24 h (odds ratios [OR] 2.50, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.76 to 3.54) and 1-week (2.50, 1.76 to 3.54), however, there was no significant difference in sinus rhythm maintenance within 4-weeks (1.37, 0.90 to 2.09). In subgroup analysis, the Bayesian NMA revealed that vernakalant may be successful in sinus rhythm maintenance within both 24 h (3.55, 2.28 to 5.55) and 1-week (2.72, 1.72 to 4.31). The results were consistent with the frequentist NMA. Conclusions: Non-early pharmacologic cardioversion may not be inferior to early cardioversion within a 4-week follow-up period in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation. The evidence remains insufficient to determine which antiarrhythmic agent is optimal in the longer run. Further high-quality relevant RCTs are necessary. Clinical Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020166862.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Recent-onset atrial fibrillation (n=2,395). Early pharmacologic cardioversion vs. Non-early cardioversion was evaluated on Sinus rhythm maintenance within 4-weeks (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.90-2.09, p=0.95). Early pharmacologic cardioversion did not significantly improve sinus rhythm maintenance within 4 weeks compared to non-early cardioversion in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (OR 1.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: