Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cycling is a popular competitive and recreational exercise and is recommended as safe to perform following hip or knee surgery. During cycling, joint contact forces (JCF) have been recorded in-vivo and estimated via neuromusculoskeletal models, but model estimates are yet to be validated. In this study, motion data, crank force, and electromyograms for a range of cadences (40 and 60 revolutions per minute (rpm)) and power outputs (25, 35, 50, 60, 79, 75, 85, 95, 120 W) were collected from 7 healthy people cycling on a powered stationary ergometer. A (1) calibrated electromyogram-informed neuromusculoskeletal model and an (2) uncalibrated model that utilised static optimisation were used to estimate hip and knee JCF. Hip and knee JCF estimates were compared against in-vivo measurements of hip and knee JCF from literature. Peak hip and knee JCF were overestimated by both electromyogram-informed and static optimisation solutions, however, the magnitude and gradients of JCF as a function of cadence and power estimated by the electromyogram-informed solution more closely matched in-vivo measurement than those computed by static optimisation. Similarly, the profile of knee JCF as a function of crank angle estimated by the electromyogram-informed solution more closely matched in-vivo knee JCF than the static optimisation solution. Results indicate electromyogram-informed modelling is a valid computational approach to estimate knee and hip biomechanics during standard seated ergometer cycling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crossley et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: