Key result
WMSI > 1 and LVEF < 56% predict non-ischemic myocardial injury in stable suspected myocarditis.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the predictive value of LV systolic dysfunction (global LVEF < 50% or regional wall motion abnormalities) for non-ischemic myocardial injury in patients with suspected myocarditis.
Does left ventricular systolic dysfunction predict non-ischemic myocardial injury on CMR in stable outpatients with suspected myocarditis?
Observational (n=773)
Yes
Does left ventricular systolic dysfunction predict non-ischemic myocardial injury on CMR in stable outpatients with suspected myocarditis?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.62 (WMSI > 1) and AUC 0.59 (LVEF < 56%)
p-value: p=<0.001
In stable outpatients with suspected myocarditis, regional wall motion abnormalities and LVEF < 56% are modest predictors of non-ischemic myocardial injury on CMR.
Background: Left ventricle (LV) systolic dysfunction, defined as a global (LVejection fraction, LVEF < 50%) and/or regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA), are the major parameters assessed in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The study evaluated the predictive value of LV systolic dysfunction for non-ischemic myocardial injury (presence of myocardial fibrosis/scar) in patients with suspected myocarditis. Methods: This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective study (2018–2021) of stable outpatients with clinically suspected myocarditis referred for a contrast-enhanced CMR. Patients with a history of any other significant cardiovascular disorders were excluded from the study. In each patient, the LV systolic function (LVEF, RWMA) and the presence and severity of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were assessed by CMR. Results: A total of 773 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. The average LVEF was 58 ± 10%, and systolic dysfunction was observed in 95 cases (12%). Subsequently, 456 patients (59%) with confirmed non-ischemic LGE in at least one segment were included in the study group. The average LVEF was 57 ± 11%, with LV systolic dysfunction observed in 126 (28%) individuals with RWMA and 84 (18%) with LVEF < 50%. The median number of LV segments with LGE was 3 (2–5), and the total amount of LGE was 6% (3–10) of the LV mass. The wall motion score index (WMSI) > 1 and LVEF < 56% were the best predictors of non-ischemic injury based on LGE (area under the curve [AUC] 0.62; sensitivity 31%; specificity 94%; p < 0.001 and AUC 0.59; sensitivity 42%; specificity 75%, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In stable patients with suspected myocarditis, any RWMA and LVEF < 56% had a predictive value for a non-ischemic myocardial injury as assessed by CMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sokolska et al. (2025) conducted an observational in suspected myocarditis (n=773). Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF and RWMA) was evaluated on Non-ischemic myocardial injury (presence of myocardial fibrosis/scar based on LGE) (AUC 0.62 (WMSI > 1) and AUC 0.59 (LVEF < 56%), p=<0.001). In stable patients with suspected myocarditis, wall motion score index > 1 and LVEF < 56% predicted non-ischemic myocardial injury (AUC 0.62 and 0.59, respectively; both p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: