This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The CD2 receptor functions as an adhesion and signal molecule in T cell recognition. Multimeric binding of CD2 on T cells to its physiologic ligand LFA-3 on cognate partner cells in vitro efficiently augments the antigen-specific T cell signal delivered by the T cell receptor/CD3 complex. The precise contribution of the antigen-nonspecific CD2-LFA-3 interactions to T cell immune responses in vivo, however, has been difficult to assess. Here we analyzed the role of CD2 in the murine immune response using a nondepleting anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody that induces a marked, reversible modulation of CD2 expression on murine T and B cells in situ. This modulation is dose and time dependent, specific for CD2, and does not require the Fc portion of the antibody. Anti-CD2 antibodies [rat IgG1 or F(ab')2] significantly inhibit the CD4+ T cell-mediated response to hen egg lysozyme and the cytotoxic CD8+ T cell response to a syngeneic tumor cell line. In both cases, anti-CD2 antibodies are only effective when administered before or within 24 h after antigen priming. The suppression of the antitumor response corresponds to a sixfold reduction of specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor cells and results in the abrogation of protective antitumor immunity. Anti-CD2 antibodies also affect the humoral immune response to oxazolone: the isotype switch from specific IgM to IgG1 antibodies is delayed, whereas the IgM response is unaltered. In addition, a single antibody injection results in sustained polyclonal unresponsiveness of T cells irrespective of antigen priming and CD2 modulation. These results document that CD2-mediated signals induce a state of T cell unresponsiveness in vivo.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gückel et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: